ABSTRACT
BackgroundInflammatory rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (iRMDs), including rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and juveneille inflammatory arthritsi (JIA), are common and cause a high disease burden globally. Early diagnosis of iRMDs and subsequent timely access to disease modifying therapies is associated with improved health and socio-economic outcomes. However, the COVID-19 pandemic meant that the way healthcare was delivered changed abruptly as all consultations were ‘remote by default' was widely implemented, replacing traditional ‘face-to-face' healthcare.ObjectivesTo describe the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic upon referral patterns and incident diagnosis of iRMDs.MethodsData from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink Aurum were analysed from 01/04/17 to 01/10/2021 to describe episodes of care for patients with musculoskeletal (MSK) conditions, in a primary care setting, for pre-COVID-19 (01/04/2017–31/03/2020), early-COVID-19 (01/04/2020–31/07/2021), and late-COVID-19 pandemic (01/08/2020–31/10/2021) periods. Prevalent and incident MSK consultations were determined. Referrals were matched to these consultations. Trends in referrals to MSK services and further incident diagnoses of iRMDs were described using Joinpoint regression and comparisons made between time-periods. Negative binomial regression was used to compare incident rates between time-periods: first MSK consultation to RA/JIA/iRMD diagnosis;first MSK consultation to first referral;first referral to RA/JIA/iRMD diagnosis. The number of consultations between first MSK consultation and referral/diagnosis were described. Results were adjusted for age and sex and further stratified by geographical region and deprivation.ResultsThe incidence of RA and JIA reduced by -13.3% (from 32.0 to 17.2 per 100,000) and -17.4% (from 1.8 to 0.97 per 1,000,000) per month respectively between January 2020 and April 2020, and then increased by 1.9% (from 17.2 to 25.2 per 100,000) and 3.7% (from 0.97 to 1.3 per 1,000,000) per month respectively between April 2020 and October 2021. The incidence of all diagnosed iRMDs was stable until October 2021. Referral incidence decreased between February 2020 and May 2020 by -16.8% (from 4.8 to 2.4 per 100) per month in patients presenting with a MSK condition. After May 2020, referrals increased significantly (16.8% per month from 2.4 to 4.5 per 100) to July 2020. Time from first MSK consultation to RA diagnosis, and referral to RA diagnosis increased in the early-pandemic period (rate ratio (RR) 1.11, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.07-1.15;RR 1.23, 95%CI 1.17-1.30) and remained consistently higher in the late-pandemic (RR 1.13, 95%CI 1.11-1.16;RR 1.27, 95%CI 1.23-1.32) periods respectively, compared to the pre-COVID-19 period.ConclusionPatients with underlying RA/JIA that developed during the pandemic may be yet to present, or in the process of being referred and/or diagnosed. Primary care clinicians should remain alert to this possibility and consider the use of fast-track referral pathways where indicated. It is apparent that patients developing incident episodes of inflammatory arthropathies may display a prodrome of other MSK symptoms and conditions, which alone may not warrant referral but in combination require further investigation. Commissioners should be alert to these findings to allow for the appropriate planning and commissioning of services.References[1]Jordan KP, Kadam UT, Hayward R, et al. Annual consultation prevalence of regional musculoskeletal problems in primary care: an observational study. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2010;11:144.[2]NHS England and NHS Improvement. Important and urgent - Next steps on NHS response to COVID-19 2020. Available at: https://www.england.nhs.uk/coronavirus/wp-content/uploads/sites/52/2020/03/C0098-total-triage-blueprint-september-2020-v3.pdf Accessed Oct 2, 2021.AcknowledgementsWe wish to acknowledge: members of our PPIE group who helped to formulate the research question and provide insight into the implications of our results;and to Prof Edward Roddy, Prof Sa antha Hider and Dr Lorna Clarson for their insights as consultant rheumatologists and commissioners of healthcare services.Disclosure of InterestsNone Declared.
ABSTRACT
Background/Aims The COVID-19 pandemic abruptly changed healthcare delivery. This study describes the impact the pandemic had on time to referral and diagnosis of inflammatory arthropathies (IA), including rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and juvenile inflammatory arthritis (JIA), in patients presenting in primary care with musculoskeletal problems. Methods Data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) Aurum were analysed from 01/04/17 to 01/10/2021 to describe episodes of care for patients with musculoskeletal conditions for pre-COVID-19 (01/04/ 2017-31/03/2020), peri-COVID-19 (01/04/2020-31/07/2021), and post- COVID-19 lockdown (01/08/2020-31/10/2021) periods. Prevalent and incident musculoskeletal consultations were determined. Referrals were matched to these consultations. Trends in referrals to musculoskeletal services and further incident diagnoses of IA were described using Joinpoint Regression and comparisons made between timeperiods. Negative binomial regression was used to compare incident rates between time-periods of: RA/JIA/IA diagnosis and referral from first musculoskeletal consultation;and RA/JIA/IA diagnosis from first referral. The number of consultations between first musculoskeletal consultation and referral/diagnosis were described. Results were adjusted for age and sex and further stratified by geographical region and deprivation. Results The incidence rate of RA and JIA reduced by average -13.32% (from 31.98 per 1,000,000 to 17.15 per 1,000,000) and -17.43% (from 1.77 per 1,000,000 to 0.97 per 1,000,000) per month respectively between January 2020 and April 2020, then increased by 1.9% (from 17.15 per 1,000,000 to 25.22 per 1,000,000) and 3.7% (from 0.97 per 1,000,000 to 1.28 per 1,000,000) per month respectively between April 2020 and October 2021. Referral incidence decreased between February 2020 and May 2020 by -16.8% per month in patients presenting with a musculoskeletal condition. After May 2020, referrals increased significantly (16.8% per month) July 2020. Time from first musculoskeletal consultation to RA diagnosis, and referral to RA diagnosis increased in the peri-COVID-19 period (IRR 1.11, 95%CI 1.07-1.15;IRR 1.23, 95%CI 1.17-1.30) and remained consistent in the post- COVID-19 (IRR 1.13, 95%CI 1.11-1.16;IRR 1.27, 95%CI 1.23-1.32) periods respectively, compared to the pre-COVID-19 period. Similarly, number of consultations between first musculoskeletal consultation and referral/RA diagnosis reduced significantly in the peri-COVID-19 (IRR 0.92, 95%CI 0.88-0.96) and post-COVID-19 (IRR 0.92, 95%CI 0.90-0.95) periods. No change was observed between first musculoskeletal consultation and first referral. Similar results were observed for IA but not for JIA. Conclusion Patients with RA/JIA onset during the pandemic may be yet to present or are currently transitioning through referral and diagnosis. Primary care clinicians should remain alert to possible IA diagnosis and consider fast-track referral pathways where indicated. Patients developing incident episodes of IA may display a prodrome of other musculoskeletal symptoms and conditions, which alone may not warrant referral but in combination require further investigation. Commissioners should be alert to these findings to allow for the appropriate planning and commissioning of services.
ABSTRACT
It is no surprise to many that the impact of Covid-19 on older adults, particularly LGBTQ and people of color has been detrimental, not just physically, but mentally, socially, and economically. Many African American/Black adults have suffered disproportionately during the pandemic. In terms of Social Security more than nine in 10 (93%) older Black Americans report that having adequate Social Security benefits is important, but for the many who were forced to retire early due to the pandemic, they will be at a disadvantage. LGBTQ older adults experience persistent discrimination due to sexual orientation or gender identity. When the LGBTQ individual was African American/Black, experiences of discrimination were higher and often occurred in the workplace. These forms of discrimination are directly impacts ones earning potential both during active work years and in retirement savings. AARP has a long history of being an advocate for marginalized and vulnerable adults. AARP staff will discuss policy needs and what the post pandemic workplaces needs to ensure that older LGBTQ people can thrive in the workplace with dignity and respect. The 2021 AARP's Vital Voices research will be used to showcase the economic impact the pandemic has had on older adults, African American communities, Hispanic/Latino communities, Asian Pacific Islander communities and LGBTQ communities. AARP staff will discuss strategies and tactics needed to ensure that opportunities for economic recovery for older adults. The survey gathers information to gauge opinions on a range of topics as well as breaking and current issues.
ABSTRACT
Background: ''Long COVID'' a condition that occurs when individuals with a confirmed COVID-19 infection experience long-term effects which cannot be explained by an alternative diagnosis, primarily affects women. Women are frequently the decision makers regarding health-related actions in their families;therefore, their intent to carry out health-related behaviors is likely to affect the adoption of health behaviors for their families as well. To date, only 51% of U.S. adults indicated that they were somewhat or very worried about Long COVID. Since the most likely way to prevent Long COVID is to prevent COVID-19 (re)infection, COVID-19 preventive measures may also help prevent the spread of Long COVID. Objective(s): In a sample of women, examine associations among demographics, COVID-19 diagnosis/COVID-19 vaccination status, Long COVID-related beliefs, and willingness to carry out preventive behaviors. Method(s): Panel survey firm Qualtrics was used to recruit a sample of N= 311 English-speaking U.S. women. The Health Belief Model (HBM) was used as a theoretical lens. Result(s): Black women were more likely to comply with COVID-19 protective measures of wearing masks (p < .001) and testing before attending an event (p = .049) than White women. Among this sample of women, HBM constructs added significantly to the regression models, especially susceptibility to Long COVID and self-efficacy to wear a mask and test for COVID-19. In addition, perceived benefits of mask-wearing (p < .001), testing before an event (p = .002), and getting a vaccine booster (p = .001) predicted intent to carry out these actions. Perceived severity of Long COVID did not significantly predict adherence to preventive behaviors. Conclusion(s): Further education is needed on the severity of Long COVID and its potential consequences. Public health messaging about Long COVID may be an effective means of increasing COVID-19 preventive behaviors that are effective against both COVID-19 and Long COVID.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The traditional model of care of the Orthopaedic Fracture Clinic (OFC) is labour intensive, expensive, has poor satisfaction rates, and often has minimal impact on management and outcomes of patients with minor injuries. Our aim was to implement a Virtual Fracture Clinic (VFC) for the management of minor injuries that is safe, reduces OFC clinic workload and reduces the OFC failure to attend (FTA) rate. METHODS: This study was a retrospective longitudinal audit of OFC workload before (January 2012 -February 2017) and after (March 2017 - December 2019) implementation of the VFC. It was performed in an urban district general hospital in South East Queensland, Australia. The primary outcome measures included attendances per timepoint (month). RESULTS: Overall, we observed a significant reduction in total number of patients from 1, 055 (IQR 104.5) to 831 (IQR: 103) per month coming through the OFC following the introduction of the VFC (F = 21.9;df=1;p <0.0001). The failure to attend rate was reduced by 44% from 271 (IQR: 127.3) to 151 (IQR: 72.8) (F=4.0;df=1;p = 0.047). CONCLUSION: The VFC implementation was successful in improving efficiency and reducing the current OFC workload, as well as reducing FTA rate. Reduction in clinic workload allows more time to be spent with complex patients, prevents clinic backlogs and overbooking, and crowding of waiting rooms. In the midst of a global pandemic that is spread by close contact, virtual clinics seem the way of the future to treat patients whilst minimising risk of COVID-19 spread. © 2021 Australasian College of Health Service Management. All Rights Reserved.
ABSTRACT
AVENuE - Avelumab in the frontline treatment of advanced classic Hodgkin lymphoma - a window study Background Response adapted ABVD (doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine) has become a standard of care in many countries for advanced stage classic Hodgkin Lymphoma (cHL), as investigated in the RATHL study: following 2 cycles of ABVD patients with negative (Deauville 1-3) interim PET (iPET2) proceeded to 4 cycles of AVD;those with positive (Deauville 4-5) iPET2 intensified therapy to escalated bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, prednisolone (escBEACOPP) or BEACOPP every 14 days. Overall this strategy was associated with a 3-year progression free survival (PFS) of 82.6%, and outcomes for patients with positive iPET2 were disappointing with 3y progression-free survival (PFS) of 67.5%. More intensive treatment such as upfront use of escBEACOPP has been reported to produce higher PFS (89% at 5 years), but it is unclear whether overall survival (OS) is improved. More intensive treatment is, however, associated with higher risk of toxicity. Inhibitors of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) or programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) have established efficacy in relapsed / refractory cHL with response rates of 55-87%. In the front line setting PD-1 inhibitors have a reported complete metabolic response (CMR) rate of 18-37%. Response to PD-L1 inhibitors in the frontline setting has not been explored. Serial serum TARC (thymus and activation-regulated chemokine) is reported to be prognostic in the frontline treatment of cHL and may aid response assessment because PET interpretation with checkpoint inhibitors is often complex. In the context of PD-1 inhibition, PD-1 expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and 9p24.1 copy gain by fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) are reported to correlate with response. Methods AVENuE is a Phase II single-arm multicentre study with sites in the UK and Australia assessing the safety and efficacy of 2 cycles (4 doses) of the PD-L1 inhibitor avelumab for untreated high-risk stage II-IV cHL prior to the iPET2 response adapted approach described above. Eligible patients must be 16-60 years, ECOG 0-1, and have adequate organ function. Patients with;compressive symptoms from lymphoma, autoimmune disorders or immunosuppressive treatment within 2 months are excluded. The primary endpoint is the centrally reviewed PET CMR rate to avelumab. Secondary endpoints are: the safety and tolerability of sequential avelumab and combination chemotherapy as assessed by CTCAE v 5.0;the iPET2 CMR rate after avelumab and 2 cycles of ABVD;PFS and OS at one year. Using a single stage A'hern design, target recruitment is 47 patients to give 90% power at a 0.05% one sided alpha to exclude an overall response rate (ORR) to 2 cycles of avelumab of < 20%;an ORR of 40% would be considered worthy of further study. Recruitment has continued during the COVID-19 pandemic. 29 patients have been enrolled. Exploratory endpoints include correlating disease response with baseline PD-1 copy number by FISH and PD-1 expression by IHC. Serial serum TARC is being explored as an aid to response assessment and changes in peripheral blood immune cell subset are being investigated as possible biomarkers of response. Trial funder: Pfizer Ltd in alliance with Merck KGaA Pfizer Ltd is providing funding as part of an Alliance between Pfizer and Merck KGaA Clinical trials.gov NCT03617666 EUDRACT No.: 2018-002227-42 Disclosures: Hawkes: Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel and accommodation expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau;Regeneron: Speakers Bureau;Merck KgA: Research Funding;Astra Zeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau;Janssen: Speakers Bureau;Merck Sharpe Dohme: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Gilead: Membership on an entity's Boa d of Directors or advisory committees;Antigene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Bristol Myers Squib/Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding;Specialised Therapeutics: Consultancy. Barrington: Bristol Myers Squibb international corporation: Research Funding;Pfizer Inc: Research Funding;Amgen Ltd: Research Funding;Takeda Speakers Bureau: Honoraria. McKay: Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Gilead: Honoraria, Other: Travel Support;KITE: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel Support;Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Travel Support;Beigene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;BMS/Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Iyengar: Janssen: Other: conference support, Speakers Bureau;Abbvie: Other: conference support;Beigene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: conference support, Speakers Bureau;Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: conference support, Speakers Bureau. Radford: Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau;AstraZeneca: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company;ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau;BMS: Honoraria. Shah: Abbvie, Janssen and Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Clifton-Hadley: Bristol-Myers Squibb Pharmaceuticals Ltd.: Other: The haematology team at the CTC has received funding (which in part pays staff salary) to Sponsor and coordinate clinical trials.;Amgen: Other: The haematology team at the CTC has received funding (which in part pays staff salary) to Sponsor and coordinate clinical trials.;Celgene: Other: The haematology team at the CTC has received funding (which in part pays staff salary) to Sponsor and coordinate clinical trials.;Merck Sharp and Dohme: Other: The haematology team at the CTC has received funding (which in part pays staff salary) to Sponsor and coordinate clinical trials.;Janssen-Cilag: Other: The haematology team at the CTC has received funding (which in part pays staff salary) to Sponsor and coordinate clinical trials.;Pfizer: Other: The haematology team at the CTC has received funding (which in part pays staff salary) to Sponsor and coordinate clinical trials.;Millennium pharmaceutics inc.: Other: The haematology team at the CTC has received funding (which in part pays staff salary) to Sponsor and coordinate clinical trials. Collins: Beigene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau;Pfizer: Honoraria;Celgene: Research Funding;Amgen: Research Funding;AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Research Funding;ADC Therapeutics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Celleron: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding;Merck Sharp & Dohme: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding;Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau;Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau;Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau;Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel expenses, Speakers Bureau. OffLabel Disclosure: Avelumab prior to frontline chemotherapy in advanced stage classic Hodgkin lymphoma.
ABSTRACT
The global pandemic caused by the novel coronavirus (SARS-COV-2) has forced many universities to abruptly change the delivery of courses from in-person to online. This change to remote learning requires creating new ways to deliver lectures, exams, and discussion groups through online meeting platforms. An often-overlooked challenge is performing lab courses that require access to specialized equipment and resources typically found in the undergraduate laboratory classrooms. Here we discuss some strategies for developing and implementing a full semester neuroscience laboratory course that allows students to fully participate in laboratory exercises at home or in their dorm rooms. Performing lab exercises remotely and independently was shown to significantly improve participant's self-efficacy and confidence that they can learn complex neuroscience material, when compared to participants who passively watch experiments online. We review best practices to ensure that lessons can be successfully demonstrated by the instructor and carried out by all students. Finally, we discuss the need to provide a level playing field such that all students may succeed, regardless of their current technology resources at home.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Understanding how severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) is spread within the hospital setting is essential in order to protect staff, implement effective infection control measures, and prevent nosocomial transmission. METHODS: The presence of SARS-CoV-2 in the air and on environmental surfaces around hospitalized patients, with and without respiratory symptoms, was investigated. Environmental sampling was undertaken within eight hospitals in England during the first wave of the coronavirus disease 2019 outbreak. Samples were analysed using reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and virus isolation assays. FINDINGS: SARS-CoV-2 RNA was detected on 30 (8.9%) of 336 environmental surfaces. Cycle threshold values ranged from 28.8 to 39.1, equating to 2.2 x 105 to 59 genomic copies/swab. Concomitant bacterial counts were low, suggesting that the cleaning performed by nursing and domestic staff across all eight hospitals was effective. SARS-CoV-2 RNA was detected in four of 55 air samples taken <1 m from four different patients. In all cases, the concentration of viral RNA was low and ranged from <10 to 460 genomic copies/m3 air. Infectious virus was not recovered from any of the PCR-positive samples analysed. CONCLUSIONS: Effective cleaning can reduce the risk of fomite (contact) transmission, but some surface types may facilitate the survival, persistence and/or dispersal of SARS-CoV-2. The presence of low or undetectable concentrations of viral RNA in the air supports current guidance on the use of specific personal protective equipment for aerosol-generating and non-aerosol-generating procedures.